CALIFORNIA CASES
Speeding police car
Settlement: $13,000,000
A Hawthorne Police
Department police cruiser traveling in excess of 70 mph without any emergency
lights or sirens broadsided another vehicle causing that other vehicle to split
in half killing the driver; defendants claimed the decedent was at fault (Preza
v. City of Hawthorne, Los Angeles County Superior Court, plaintiff attorney: Brian J. Panish).
Hand crush
Settlement: $2,000,000
A shuttle van operator closed a van door on plaintiff's left hand causing a
crush injury to her index and middle fingers and allegedly complex regional
pain syndrome (Fitch-Hutton v. PM Hospitality Strategies Inc., Orange
County Superior Court, plaintiff attorneys: James P. Carr/Tyler J. Barnett).
Excessive force claim
Verdict: Defense
Plaintiff claimed police
officers broke his arm, sprained his shoulder, used a choke hold to render him
unconscious and then maliciously prosecuted him for resisting arrest (Rezek
v. City of Tustin, Central District Federal Court, defense attorney: Robert
L. Kaufman).
Cheerleader suit
Settlement: $1,250,000
Plaintiffs Raiderettes
claimed the Oakland Raiders violated numerous labor laws including wage
violations, overtime violations, failure to provide meal and rest breaks, and
unlawful deductions (L.T. v. Oakland Raiders, Alameda County Superior
Court, plaintiff attorney: Sharon R. Vinick).
Lacerated liver
Settlement: $450,000
Plaintiff allegedly
suffered a lacerated liver, hemothorax and several other injuries when the
limousine bus in which he was a passenger collided with a big rig at 55 mph (Gaeta
v. Smith d/b/a The Limousine Scene, Kern County Superior Court, plaintiff attorney: Matthew C. Clark).
Elder abuse
Settlement: $1,823,000
A 90-year-old board and
care resident allegedly underwent improper surgeries which led to his death (Confidential
v. Confidential, Los Angeles County Superior Court, plaintiff attorney: Carl
A. McMahan).
Indemnity sought
Verdict: Cross-Defense
In the underlying action,
cross-defendant's vehicle was rear-ended by a tow truck causing an 11-year-old
to be ejected; Farmers Insurance settled for $850,000 on behalf of the tow
truck operator, but then cross-complained against cross-defendant for indemnity
claiming that if driver/mother had seat belted her 11-year-old, the child would
not have been injured (McNeil v. DiVirgilio, San Bernardino County
Superior Court, Cross-defense attorney: A.J. Pyka).
Trash truck
Verdict: $479,000
Plaintiff alleged that
defendant's driver of a sanitation truck crossed a double yellow line and ran
plaintiff off the road and into a utility pole causing knee, back and neck
injuries (Eze v. D&G Sanitation, Santa Cruz County Superior Court, plaintiff attorney: Brad C. Brereton).
Disability discrimination
Decision: $323,858
Plaintiff claimed that
defendant employer failed to accommodate plaintiff's disability which resulted
from an on-the-job injury to her right arm (Macias v. Wella Corp., Los
Angeles County Superior Court, plaintiff attorney: Robert S. Scuderi).
Cab passenger killed
Verdict: Defense
A heavily intoxicated cab passenger exited a cab to vomit, refused to return,
wandered onto Highway 101, and ultimately was struck and killed by a
hit-and-run driver; jury found defendant cab driver/company to be negligent but
that negligence was not a substantial factor in causing the death (Quintanar
v. Absolute Cab L.L.C., Santa Barbara County Superior Court, defense attorney: Robert T. Bergsten).
NATIONAL CASES
School funding
Settlement: $40,500,000
Through a mediated
settlement, the parties resolved a 25-year dispute over school funding;
plaintiff initially demanded $26.6 million and defendant initially offered $1.7
million; settlement for $40.5 million plus an additional $8.5 million in anticipated
sales tax revenue for plaintiff (Rowan-Salisbury Bd. of Educ. v. Rowan Bd.
of Comm'rs, North Carolina – Rowan County Superior Court, plaintiff attorneys: Richard A. Schwartz/Brian C. Shaw).
Reverse discrimination claim
Verdict: Defense
Plaintiff, a female
Caucasian CPA, alleged her supervisor, afraid of being accused of racism,
engaged in reverse discrimination; jury found that plaintiff's race or color
was not a motivating factor in defendant's decision to terminate her employment
(Bassett v. Hunt Consolidated Inc., Texas – Dallas County District Court, defense attorneys: Michael K. Hurst/Rachel D. Ziolkowski).