Proposed revisions to the Standards for Attorney Sanctions for Professional Misconduct would, among other things, add five aggravating circumstances and amend three mitigating circumstances, impose disbarment in many instances in which an attorney defaults in a disciplinary proceeding, require compliance with rule 9.20 if an actual suspension exceeds 60 days, and specify suspension periods.
SOURCE: |
Board Committee on Discipline Oversight |
DEADLINE: |
July 12, 2010 05:00 PM |
CONTACT: |
Itzel Berrio
180 Howard St.,
San Francisco, CA 94105
415-538-2541
itzel.berrio@calbar.ca.gov |
Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 06-0004 asks: If an attorney receives from a non-party a confidential communication between opposing counsel and opposing counsel’s client what the attorney should do if he or she reasonably believes that the communication may not be privileged because of the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege.
SOURCE: |
Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct |
DEADLINE: |
July 16, 2010 05:00 PM |
CONTACT: |
Angela Marlaud
180 Howard St.,
San Francisco, CA 94105
415-538-2116
415-538-2171 (fax)
angela.marlaud@calbar.ca.gov |
Proposed Formal Opinion Interim No. 08-0001 considers when an attorney violates rule 4-400 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct by accepting a gift from a client.
SOURCE: |
Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct |
DEADLINE: |
July 16, 2010 05:00 PM |
CONTACT: |
Angela Marlaud
180 Howard St.,
San Francisco, CA 94105
415-538-2116
415-538-2171 (fax)
angela.marlaud@calbar.ca.gov |